|
T of C
Home |
My Work |
Hand- books |
Qin as Object |
Qin in Art |
Poetry / Song |
Hear Qin |
Play Qin |
Analysis | History |
Ideo- logy |
Miscel- lanea |
More Info |
Personal | email me search me |
| Origins Silk Strings Tassels Tuning Pegs Studs Qin body diagrams | 首頁 |
|
Acquiring a Guqin
1
Appendices: 1998, 2010 |
取得古琴
|
The first obstacle to getting started in the 2,000 year old silk string qin tradition is acquiring an instrument. It is somewhat easier getting started in the nylon-metal string guqin tradition,2 which dates from the Cultural Revolution and has quite a different aesthetic.3 This is because, although the traditional aesthetic requires the use of silk strings, qin makers today almost exclusively construct their instruments for use with the nylon-metal strings (sometimes mis-represented as "new silk"); these tend to be structurally different in several ways.4 Some of these modern instruments may work fine with silk strings, but the only way to find out is to remove the metal strings and test them with silk (regarding which see "availability"). This is quite a laborious process.
Whether going for the old way or new way, it is still best to follow the tradition of buying a guqin from or with advice from one's teacher. I will assist students in buying a silk string guqin from China. My commission is repaid via several free lessons, perhaps taught over the internet.5
To my knowledge, as of 2010 the only qin makers selling qins already strung with silk strings are:
I now generally use a Wang Peng qin for performance and can recommend his basic instruments for beginners. However, they are not cheap: with the strengthening of Chinese yuan, his basic instruments generally start at about US$1,800 (including shipping; he has "practice qins" for less).
For many years my main concert instruments were made by
He Mingwei in Chengdu. In general their finishing is unexceptional,8 but mine have a very good silk string sound. He stopped making qins some years ago, then apparently began again recently. However, I believe these are now aimed purely at the metal string market. The same is true of other well-known makers such as Zeng Chengwei, also of Chengdu, and Li Mingzhong of Xi'an. Some of their older instruments would have been designed for silk strings.
Before buying a qin, the first question you need to ask is: do you want to play the instrument, or simply hang it on the wall, perhaps with no strings but with the famous couplet attributed to Tao Yuanming, 365-427 CE),
There is probably no connection between this philosophical point of view and the fact that many of the best old instruments are unplayed, belonging either to collectors who don't play or to museums that don't allow them to be played (Qins in captivity?).
The quality of instruments available ranges from very bad to exquisitely good, so if you want to take the trouble actually to play you must decide whether to begin with a cheap instrument probably designed for the modern nylon-metal string market or to try to begin with a better instrument, which would make it easier to follow the ancient silk string tradition. While I can mention here a few guidelines in selecting one, I don't at all consider myself a specialist in this area. Some people apparently can tell the quality simply by knocking on the body with their knuckles and playing a few notes. I cannot do this.
If you see a qin in a general Chinese music/music instrument store, almost certainly it is a glossy factory made instrument. In 1979, in the Cantonese feature film House of the Lute, for which I provided the music, an actor pretended to play such an instrument while I provided music with my own qin. Other than that, the film used it in two ways that at the time seemed most appropriate for such an instrument: it hung on a wall (with strings: one night a string broke, strangling a rat in the process); and it was subsequently used to bludgeon the old man to death.
Some shops perhaps can tell you about qin teachers. In this case you should try to contact the teacher and ask for advice.
An instrument which at first seems to have quite an ordinary sound might
improve after a few years (or centuries!) of use; however, a lot of old
instruments still have very ordinary sound. An instrument, new or old, might
be improved, for example, by adding soundposts inside. A good luthier may
be able to help with this.9
My biggest problem in testing qins is, as mentioned, that almost invariably they come with metal strings on them. It is my observation that almost all qins today are tested with metal strings during the construction process. Since the best qins for use with metal strings are not necessarily the best qins for use with silk strings this means that for me to judge a qin I must first take it home, put on silk strings and try it in the dead of night, perhaps for several weeks.
In the United States the major source of metal string qins is via the website of Wang Fei's
North
American Guqin Association, in the San Francisco area. Her catalogue sometimes indicates that an instrument can be used with silk strings, but since to my knowledge Wang Fei rarely uses silk strings,10 this information is difficult to verify.
1.
Information from Tong Kin-Woon on acquiring a guqin
2.
Acquiring a metal string qin (compare
silk string qin makers)
3.
Differences in aesthetics between silk and metal string qins
3.
Differences between construction of silk and metal stringed instruments
It is not clear to what extent Wang Peng actually makes instruments specifically for use with silk strings: his better instruments are said to be designed for silk strings, but many are used with metal strings, this still being his main market in spite of his promotion of the silk string tradition. It should also be pointed out that his design of the sound chamber is modern: instead of the traditional sound posts he makes his instruments thicker on the side with the lower strings.
4.
Since I currently reside in Mumbai, India, this usually means lessons via video Skype.
5.
Wang Peng 王鵬
why take the trouble of putting on the strings to play it?"
Footnotes
Most of the instruments I play today I acquired while living in Hong Kong, i.e., before 2000, and mostly through 唐健垣 Dr. Tong Kin-Woon
(TKW). The following information comes mostly from him, supplemented by advice from other interested people. Dr. Tong is himself is a qin maker and repairer as well as a player and scholar. The qins he makes have a marvelous sound. Unfortunately, he has no interest in silk strings.
(Return)
It is easy to find inexpensive qins in China, and also quite possible in the USA. There is some information on this in an appendix
below.
(Return)
Nylon-metal strings were developed during the Cultural Revolution as part of an effort to turn the qin from an inward instrument of self-cultivation to an outward instrument of performance. The playing techniques required of the two different types of strings are very different. Pointing this out is not intended as a criticism of the nylon-metal strings, which have their own advantages.
(Return)
Wang Peng says that the main differences between his qins for use with silk strings are in three areas.
(Return)
(Return)
As of 2009 Wang Peng said that he did not use the new silk strings by Pan Guohui (see Fang Yuting), and the silk string qins I saw by him all had strings by Huang Shizhi, which are in very limited supply. If this is true, this suggests that he sells very few silk string qins.
(Return)
| 6. Ni Shiyun 倪詩韻 | With Ni Shiyun in 2009 trying out his qin |
Ni Shiyun lives in Haimen, Jiangsu province. Contact details I have are:
Ni is probably providing silk strings for some of his guqin because of his association with 王鐸 Wang Duo, a Suzhou qin player who actively promotes silk string qins. I recently bought for under $1,000 and had shipped to the US an excellent instrument strung with the silk strings being made by Pan Guohui. Although these strings are not always of very high quality, the better ones are quite acceptable once they are broken in.
(Return)
7.
Improving the qin surface
Initially I had the lacquer on my qins made more smooth by getting a violin maker to rub the surface with a special cloth). Later, after further damage was caused when checking in my qin for trans-Pacific flights, largely due to the change in temperature in the unpressurized airplane luggage compartment, I gave them to Wang Peng for further repair. Their appearance improved considerably as a result.
(Return)
8.
Sound posts
See Assemblage of the inner top: placing the sound posts requires considerable skill. See also the further comments under Qin Construction (search for "sound posts" and "metal strings").
(Return)
9.
Wang Fei and silk strings
As of 2006 the "Listening Room" on Wang Fei's website includes one track of her playing with silk strings, so perhaps this situation may change. On the other hand her statements about her "Naga new silk" strings suggest that her ideas about traditional qin sound are rather different from my own.
(Return)
Appendix I: Information dated 1998
As of 1998 there were about 16 factories in Yangzhou making guqin.
There were also qin factories in several other parts of China, including Beijing and Shanghai. Sometimes they look nice and shiny, but the sound is rarely any good. Often they are painted rather than lacquered, and have hidden structural flaws. The wood may be untreated, hence crack easily.
On the other hand, some of these instruments are quite good. Recently
there has been a mini-boom in the demand for qins, and quite a few are being
made with false cracking, which gives them something of the appearance of age.
One of the reasons for the rush to make qins is said to be the dwindling
supply of good wood, much of it old wood taken from old buildings or even
coffins. (Old wood is not necessary better than good quality new wood which
has been properly cured, but good quality new wood is also in short supply
and it may not be properly cured.)
There are also some qin makers in Hong Kong and Taiwan, but the cost tends to
be higher than products of similar quality from China. In addition, there are
a number of individuals in China and elsewhere who have made a few qins,
some of them of very good quality, but these are harder to find. Some are made only for personal use.
The following are the best professional makers, together with an approximate
price range (in US dollars; 1998):
As mentioned above, I have a number of new instruments by He Mingwei. The basic sound is very good, but he was rather casual about the finish, typically using ceramic instead of deer horn powder in the lacquer (more recently he is apparently sometimes using deer horn powder), and not rubbing the surface to optimum smoothness.
Variation in price is sometimes due to sound quality, but also sometimes
results from some precious stone being imbedded in the instrument or it being
a copy of some famous instrument or style. In the case of Li Mingzhong, he
is able to get very good old wood (some perhaps Han dynasty, though this
is not necessarily the best), and some of his instruments are really very good.
Yangzhou is a center for making music instruments of all types; there is good potential for qins as there is a lot of old wood available. There are factories where the owner hires skilled woodcraftsmen who may know nothing of qins; then he gives them an instrument and asks them to copy it. The result may be a hundred or more identical instruments. Another factory might copy a great variety of styles. One is particularly known for instruments with cracks in the lacquer which look authentically old.
TKW said that one of the best sources has been the factory of a Mr. Tian,
because he had as advisor a certain Mr. Liu. After a time Mr. Liu made an
agreement that he would be paid by being able to select for himself a certain
number of instruments. Since he knew a good sound, he took the best ones;
he keeps them at his home in a village an hour or so drive from Yangzhou,
and sells them with a healthy markup.
This is typical of the complex factors involved in buying a new qin. It is easy to go wrong if you don't know what you are doing. With an antique the problems are similar (there are a lot of fake antiques, some quite good) but the stakes are much higher.
Hence, unless you are confident of your ability to find a good instrument yourself, I recommend going to someone like Dr. Tong. He currently has about 300 new instruments, including several by each of the individuals mentioned above and many from Yangzhou. He can give good advice on quality and so the result is likely to be better than going directly to a mainland source.
Tong also has several antique qins. Of these he says "certainly one is
Song dynasty and some might be older, but it is difficult to prove." Their prices range from about US$10,000 to over 30,000.
In closing I pass on this story from Dr. Tong. In 1994 Christie's sold a Ming qin for over US$100,000. The American buyers paid so much because it had the seal of a Ming prince as the maker. They didn't realize that the prince (Lu Wang) had made dozens of these not-particularly-good instruments, and so they are not much valued by knowledgeable collectors.
See related information under Qin construction
or return to the top.
Appendix I: Information dated 2010
The following are some additional guidelines updated in 2010 for people not acquiring their guqin via their teacher. These instruments will almost invariably come with nylon-metal strings.
Within the USA two possible sources of inexpensive guqins are:
It is also possible within the USA (and perhaps Europe) to buy a guqin off the internet. If this is done through a medium such as Ebay it could be very risky. If ordered directly from a maker in China shipping usually runs about $100 to $200 and it is probably necessary to be able to communicate in Chinese.
For price and selection it is, of course, best to go directly to the maker (such as those mentioned above. Since this means traveling to China, having the ability to speak Chinese (or having a friend who can interpret), and already knowing something about guqins, hence the recommendation to rely on one's teacher.
Guqins are sold in shops in several Chinese cities, in particular Shanghai, Suzhou and Beijing. In Beijing, September 2009, I looked at qins in some of the many music shops gathered on 南新華街 Nan Xinhua Street just south of 琉璃場 Liuli Chang. The cheapest I found was about 800 RMB; I doubt it was lacquered properly, but its appearance was not too bad. Some of those around the 3,000 RMB range seemed possible for people who hadn't committed themselves to lifelong guqin play. There were at least two shops that specialized in guqin and guzheng; they were very close to each other on the west side of the street about 100 meters south of Liuli Chang. When the shops were open the guqins were clearly visible from the street:
It is not clear to me why the street numbers are said to be 臨時 temporary.
Return to top
He Mingwei: $1,400 - 8,000 (TKW: personally selected, so start at 2,500)
Li Xingqi : $1,000 - $3,000
Zeng Chengwei : $700 - $3,000
Li Mingzhong $1,200 - $2,000
(though he is know to ask for as much as $10,000)
Li Guangyi: $500 and up
good wood is available in Guizhou and Mr. Li apparently has been
advised by Shanghai player Gong Yi, so that some of his instruments
may be a good bargain.
Yan Ming has been working with TKW to make instruments, some quite
good, starting about US$2,000; output is still very small, though.
a variety of sources, with prices from about US$500 on up (see below).
金典古箏(古箏、古琴),南新華街臨時89-4 (焦宏橋?)